Einstein, Having read ALL the posts over the years I can absolutely tell you that Johns position has garnered far more support than the "0" positive responses you have earned.
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 5:49 PM, NoEinstein <[email protected]>wrote: > J. Ashley: Has anyone posted any comments in support of your caveman > anarchy? Ha, ha, HA! — J. A. A. — > > > On May 16, 5:42 pm, Jonathan <[email protected]> wrote: > > I find it extremely interesting that the only comments on John's New > > Constitution come from those who are able to poke holes in it. I have > > yet to see anyone post any comments in support of his diatribe. > > > > On 05/16/2011 01:41 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > > Do this MJ: Spend nearly 15 years of your life pinning and polishing > > > a New Constitution. On the day of the referendum, the voters will get > > > to decide whose has the most appeal to them. Your ideas of the worth > > > of my document don't matter. � J. A. A. � > > > On May 16, 2:11 pm, MJ<[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Again you attempt to change the subject. > > >> Whether I read or have read Atlas Shrugged is irrelevant ... just like > the remainder of your response. > > >> Regard$, > > >> --MJ "It is not the business of government to make men virtuous or > religious or to preserve the fool from the consequences of his own folly. > Government should be repressive no further than is necessary to secure > liberty by protecting the equal rights of each from aggression...[when] > governmental prohibitions extend beyond this line they are in danger of > defeating the very ends they are intended to serve" --Henry GeorgeAt 07:44 > PM 5/12/2011, you wrote:MJ: You should read 'Atlas Shrugged.' Government > could NEVER > > >> orchestrate an entire economy, the way "the law of supply and demand" > > >> can. Our biggest problem with government is that those out-of-touch, > > >> career politicians have zero real-world experience. They actually > > >> BELIEVE that they are necessary to determine how everything on Earth > > >> gets done. Within four total years of the ratification my New > > >> Constitution there won't be a single "career path" politician in > > >> Washington! � J. A. A. � > > >> On May 12, 1:47 pm, MJ<[email protected]> wrote: > > >>> At 08:18 PM 5/11/2011, you wrote:Dear Jonathan: No! Only "schemes" > that have the strings being pulled > > >>> by government would be socialist. My New Constitution includes these > > >>> and other protections to require "fairness" (not... equality) from > > >>> businesses: > > >>> Government REQUIRING any business, individual, collection of > individuals that serves ANYTHING other than securing EVERYONE's right to > life; their own life; self-ownership serves to provide advantage to some at > the expense of others AND necessarily interferes with the use of one's > private property -- you know, socialism. > > >>> You STILL do not see how you are endorsing and promoting what you > claim to be eliminating."Businesses and professions shall be fair to their > employees and to > > >>> their customers. The wages, benefits and perks, as well as the > > >>> charges that are made for goods and services, shall not be > > >>> discriminatory nor exploitive of any person, group nor class, nor > > >>> shall such be overly influenced by the profit motive of those who > > >>> perform no actual work on an ongoing basis. Fair and honest business > > >>> practices require that management be forthright with employees and > > >>> customers without coercion." > > >>> This is socialism in any of its many forms. > > >>> Take 'discriminatory' -- which necessarily occurs whenever more than > one person seeks an available position ... > > >>> What about the discrimination against the Business Owner that occurs > when people choose NOT to work for him?And... "Only laws, rules, regulations > and procedures that are in the > > >>> best interest of the People and the world environment shall be > passed, > > >>> enacted or enforced, and no business contrary to such shall be > allowed > > >>> to prosper." > > >>> MORE Socialism in any of its many forms. > > >>> Regard$, > > >>> --MJ"Daily experience proves clearly to everybody but the most > bigoted fanatics of socialism that governmental management is inefficient > and wasteful" -- Ludwig von Mises in "Economic Freedom and Interventionism," > 1990. > > >> -- > > >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > > >> For options& help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > >> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > > >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > > >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > > > -- > > > > Freedom is always illegal! > > > > When we ask for freedom, we have already failed. It is only when we > > declare freedom for ourselves and refuse to accept any less, that we > > have any possibility of being free. > > > > "Why should we bother with 'realities' when we have the psychological > > refuge of unthinking patriotism?" > > Gary Leupp - Professor of History, Tufts University > > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -- *Mark M. Kahle H.* * * * * -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
