Communist/Socialists never do !!!!! Especially those in denial. On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Jonathan <[email protected]>wrote:
> John, > > A number of times in fact. But even if I took the time to find and post a > few of them, you would ignore them and post some snarky comment that has > nothing to do with what was posted. How do I know this? Simple! You never > address anything specific. > > On 05/17/2011 04:49 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > > J. Ashley: Has anyone posted any comments in support of your caveman > anarchy? Ha, ha, HA! — J. A. A. — > > On May 16, 5:42 pm, Jonathan <[email protected]> > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I find it extremely interesting that the only comments on John's New > Constitution come from those who are able to poke holes in it. I have > yet to see anyone post any comments in support of his diatribe. > > On 05/16/2011 01:41 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > Do this MJ: Spend nearly 15 years of your life pinning and polishing > a New Constitution. On the day of the referendum, the voters will get > to decide whose has the most appeal to them. Your ideas of the worth > of my document don't matter. � J. A. A. � > On May 16, 2:11 pm, MJ<[email protected]> <[email protected]> wrote: > > Again you attempt to change the subject. > Whether I read or have read Atlas Shrugged is irrelevant ... just like the > remainder of your response. > Regard$, > --MJ "It is not the business of government to make men virtuous or religious > or to preserve the fool from the consequences of his own folly. Government > should be repressive no further than is necessary to secure liberty by > protecting the equal rights of each from aggression...[when] governmental > prohibitions extend beyond this line they are in danger of defeating the very > ends they are intended to serve" --Henry GeorgeAt 07:44 PM 5/12/2011, you > wrote:MJ: You should read 'Atlas Shrugged.' Government could NEVER > orchestrate an entire economy, the way "the law of supply and demand" > can. Our biggest problem with government is that those out-of-touch, > career politicians have zero real-world experience. They actually > BELIEVE that they are necessary to determine how everything on Earth > gets done. Within four total years of the ratification my New > Constitution there won't be a single "career path" politician in > Washington! � J. A. A. � > On May 12, 1:47 pm, MJ<[email protected]> <[email protected]> wrote: > > At 08:18 PM 5/11/2011, you wrote:Dear Jonathan: No! Only "schemes" that > have the strings being pulled > by government would be socialist. My New Constitution includes these > and other protections to require "fairness" (not... equality) from > businesses: > Government REQUIRING any business, individual, collection of individuals that > serves ANYTHING other than securing EVERYONE's right to life; their own life; > self-ownership serves to provide advantage to some at the expense of others > AND necessarily interferes with the use of one's private property -- you > know, socialism. > You STILL do not see how you are endorsing and promoting what you claim to be > eliminating."Businesses and professions shall be fair to their employees and > to > their customers. The wages, benefits and perks, as well as the > charges that are made for goods and services, shall not be > discriminatory nor exploitive of any person, group nor class, nor > shall such be overly influenced by the profit motive of those who > perform no actual work on an ongoing basis. Fair and honest business > practices require that management be forthright with employees and > customers without coercion." > This is socialism in any of its many forms. > Take 'discriminatory' -- which necessarily occurs whenever more than one > person seeks an available position ... > What about the discrimination against the Business Owner that occurs when > people choose NOT to work for him?And... "Only laws, rules, regulations and > procedures that are in the > best interest of the People and the world environment shall be passed, > enacted or enforced, and no business contrary to such shall be allowed > to prosper." > MORE Socialism in any of its many forms. > Regard$, > --MJ"Daily experience proves clearly to everybody but the most bigoted > fanatics of socialism that governmental management is inefficient and > wasteful" -- Ludwig von Mises in "Economic Freedom and Interventionism," 1990. > > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options& help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > -- > > Freedom is always illegal! > > When we ask for freedom, we have already failed. It is only when we > declare freedom for ourselves and refuse to accept any less, that we > have any possibility of being free. > > "Why should we bother with 'realities' when we have the psychological > refuge of unthinking patriotism?" > Gary Leupp - Professor of History, Tufts University > > > -- > Freedom is always illegal! When we ask for freedom, we have already > failed. It is only when we declare freedom for ourselves and refuse to > accept any less, that we have any possibility of being free. > > "Why should we bother with 'realities' when we have the psychological > refuge of unthinking patriotism?" > Gary Leupp - Professor of History, Tufts University > > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > -- *Mark M. Kahle H.* * * * * -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
