MJ:  And the products of your toils are where?  Ha, ha, HA!  — J. A.
A. —

On May 16, 5:46 pm, MJ <[email protected]> wrote:
> <sigh>
> Again, you imagine toiling away for hours is somehow synonymous with quality. 
> Shit is shit whether it took you 10 minutes or 15 years.
> Regard$,
> --MJ"Any man can make mistakes, but only an idiot persists in his error. " -- 
> Marcus Tullius CiceroAt 04:41 PM 5/16/2011, you wrote:Do this MJ:  Spend 
> nearly 15 years of your life pinning and polishing
> a New Constitution.  On the day of the referendum, the voters will get
> to decide whose has the most appeal to them.  Your ideas of the worth
> of my document don't matter.  — J. A. A. —
> >
> On May 16, 2:11 pm, MJ <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Again you attempt to change the subject.
> > Whether I read or have read Atlas Shrugged is irrelevant ... just like the 
> > remainder of your response.
> > Regard$,
> > --MJ "It is not the business of government to make men virtuous or 
> > religious or to preserve the fool from the consequences of his own folly. 
> > Government should be repressive no further than is necessary to secure 
> > liberty by protecting the equal rights of each from aggression...[when] 
> > governmental prohibitions extend beyond this line they are in danger of 
> > defeating the very ends they are intended to serve" --Henry GeorgeAt 07:44 
> > PM 5/12/2011, you wrote:MJ:  You should read 'Atlas Shrugged.'  Government 
> > could NEVER
> > orchestrate an entire economy, the way "the law of supply and demand"
> > can.  Our biggest problem with government is that those out-of-touch,
> > career politicians have zero real-world experience.  They actually
> > BELIEVE that they are necessary to determine how everything on Earth
> > gets done.  Within four total years of the ratification my New
> > Constitution there won't be a single "career path" politician in
> > Washington!  — J. A. A. —
> > >
> > On May 12, 1:47 pm, MJ <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > At 08:18 PM 5/11/2011, you wrote:Dear Jonathan:  No!  Only "schemes" that 
> > > have the strings being pulled
> > > by government would be socialist.  My New Constitution includes these
> > > and other protections to require "fairness" (not... equality) from
> > > businesses:
> > > Government REQUIRING any business, individual, collection of individuals 
> > > that serves ANYTHING other than securing EVERYONE's right to life; their 
> > > own life; self-ownership serves to provide advantage to some at the 
> > > expense of others AND necessarily interferes with the use of one's 
> > > private property -- you know, socialism.
> > > You STILL do not see how you are endorsing and promoting what you claim 
> > > to be eliminating."Businesses and professions shall be fair to their 
> > > employees and to
> > > their customers.  The wages, benefits and perks, as well as the
> > > charges that are made for goods and services, shall not be
> > > discriminatory nor exploitive of any person, group nor class, nor
> > > shall such be overly influenced by the profit motive of those who
> > > perform no actual work on an ongoing basis.  Fair and honest business
> > > practices require that management be forthright with employees and
> > > customers without coercion."
> > > This is socialism in any of its many forms.
> > > Take 'discriminatory' -- which necessarily occurs whenever more than one 
> > > person seeks an available position ...
> > > What about the discrimination against the Business Owner that occurs when 
> > > people choose NOT to work for him?And... "Only laws, rules, regulations 
> > > and procedures that are in the
> > > best interest of the People and the world environment shall be passed,
> > > enacted or enforced, and no business contrary to such shall be allowed
> > > to prosper."
> > > MORE Socialism in any of its many forms.
> > > Regard$,
> > > --MJ"Daily experience proves clearly to everybody but the most bigoted 
> > > fanatics of socialism that governmental management is inefficient and 
> > > wasteful" -- Ludwig von Mises in "Economic Freedom and Interventionism," 
> > > 1990.
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to