Believing that Iran can be dissuaded from developing nuclear weapons is the real fantasy.
On Aug 17, 7:11 am, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > I would agree that our foreign policy of, "Nation Building" was misguided > and not in the best interests of the United States. I would also call > "Nation Building" a form of "Intervention". > > There is a distinction however, between "Intervention" and "Isolation". > Dr. Paul espouses the latter, and that is just as misplaced as Nation > Building. In fact, It's far more dangerous. For Dr. Paul to advocate > Iran's nuclear capabilities is just flat out scary. A clear indication that > Paul denies the reality of the world today. Dr. Paul is a brilliant guy, > he is just flat out misplaced on what constitutes a danger to our Nation. > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 4:22 AM, raymorphic <[email protected]> wrote: > > "It didn't make Dr. Paul any more correct with regard to history, or > > his > > foreign policy." > > > I'm not sure about the history part; what I refer to as sensible was > > the foreign policy solution. > > > America do not like interventionists foreign policies. > > > We couldn't run our country well, let alone running other people's > > countries. > > > In addition, we're in no financial position to intervene. > > > -- > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
