Is this your same position on Germany?  On England?  How about Canada?



On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:37 PM, plainolamerican <[email protected]
> wrote:

> the goal here is to portray the American government as insistent on
> attacking Iran,  and that whole "Blood For Oil"  theory that both love
> so
> much......Needless to say, that Richman's and Raimondo's very
> existence
> depend upon petroelum products,
> ---
> not the issue.
>
> an Iranian threat toward israel is not an American concern.
> O has made it clear to israel that we will not fight their war with
> the muzzies.
> Romney, otoh, has told them that we will. He's going to look pretty
> stupid when only mormons and zionists back him up.
>
> On Sep 17, 5:43 am, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Once again, the likes of Sheldon Richman and Justin Raimondo (through
> > Antiwar.com, which is where Richman chooses to obtain his "facts"  from)
> > try to pervert the truth.  I assume,  (although it's hard to understand
> > especially Raimondo's goal in anything....In Raimondo's case, he's just a
> > goofy crackpot who like to hear himself talk and see himself in print)
> that
> > the goal here is to portray the American government as insistent on
> > attacking Iran,  and that whole "Blood For Oil"  theory that both love so
> > much......Needless to say, that Richman's and Raimondo's very existence
> > depend upon petroelum products,  from the food that they inhale to the
> > nasty drawers on their backsides.
> >
> > Here are but just a few of the examples of:
> > "Iranian leader[s] threaten[ing] Israel with annihilation"
> >
> > (Ahmadinejad:  "Death to Israel")
> >
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FckLO8HcNyo
> >
> >  Washington Post:  The facts revolving around Ahmadinejad's purported
> > statement of "Wipe Israel Off the Map"....Note the discussion of the
> > Iranian billboards throughout the Nation, stating that Israel should be
> > "wiped off the map")
> >
> > http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/did-ahmadinejad...
> >
> > Germany's Der Spiegal News:   Summer of 2007,  Ahmadinejad:  *"the ocean
> of
> > nations of the region will get angry and will cut the root of the Zionist
> > regime from its stem."*
> >
> >  There are many, many more examples....All one has to do is
> > Google,  " Ahmadinejad +  Israel"
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 6:38 PM, MJ <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Friday, September 14, 2012
> > > *The New York Times' Lie and Truths about Iran
> > > *Posted by Sheldon Richman
> >
> > > Today's *New York Times *report "Obama Rebuffs Netanyahu on Setting
> > > Limits on Iran’s Nuclear Program"<
> http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/14/world/middleeast/obama-rebuffs-neta...>contains
> one outright lie and a couple of true statements that don't get
> > > nearly enough attention in the media.
> >
> > > The lie: Israeli officials, however, say this guarantee [that the Obama
> > > administration will prevent Iran from building a nuclear weapon] may
> not be
> > > enough for Israel, which Iranian leaders have repeatedly threatened
> with
> > > annihilation.
> >
> > > No Iranian leader has threatened Israel with annihilation.<
> http://www.antiwar.com/orig/norouzi.php?articleid=11025>
> >
> > > The truths that require more attention (emphasis added): Basing a
> > > military judgment on Iran’s stockpile of medium-enriched uranium could
> be
> > > tricky, however, because while the overall amount of this material has
> > > increased, the amount that can be readily used to fuel a bomb has
> declined<
> http://original.antiwar.com/porter/2012/09/01/iaea-report-shows-iran-...>since
> Iran converted some of it into plates to be used in a research
> > > reactor in Tehran. . . .
> > > Administration officials contend that the United States will still be
> able
> > > to detect, and prevent, Iran from passing that point. Nor does the
> > > administration have evidence that Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali
> > > Khamenei, has even made a decision to build a bomb.
> >
> > >http://sheldonfreeassociation.blogspot.com/2012/09/the-new-york-times.
> ..
> >
> > > --
> > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
> >
> > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to