Threatening to hang the President and others??? Sounds like an hangable
offense to me!!! I was always told you are not allowed to threaten the
President!!!

On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 4:49 PM, NoEinstein <[email protected]>wrote:

> Dear Plainol...: Obama shall be hanged from out of the door and steps
> of the official Presidential Helicopter, with a "rescue" beam being
> used as the attachment point for the rope.  As a former Boy Scout, I
> myself will tie the neck-breaking knot.  But I won't go on that (or
> any) helicopter.  The hanging will take place at high noon about 300
> feet above the Washington Mall reflection pools.  After the hanging,
> the helicopter shall circle the Washington monument so that the
> million or so expected spectators can get to see what TRAITORS can
> expect.  Then, while lead weights are slid down to Obama's body, which
> will be hanging about eight feet below the helicopter, he shall be
> flow our to sea and over deep international waters where the rope will
> be cut and Obama's body allowed to fall into the deep Atlantic to feed
> the hungry crabs.  The same fate will await Michelle Obama, unless she
> "wises up" and stops being Obama's smiling smoke-screen before the
> liberal media.  So far, there are seven on the list of traitors to be
> hanged, including Bill and Hillary Clinton.  Any questions?  — John A.
> Armistead —
>
> On Mar 12, 4:35 pm, plainolamerican <[email protected]> wrote:
> > he must be hanged-by-the-neck-until-dead
> > ---
> > who do you think should have the honor of hanging him?
> >
> > On Mar 12, 3:10 pm, NoEinstein <[email protected]> wrote:> Dear
> MJ:  You are smarter than this!  Obama's destroying of our free
> > > enterprise capitalist system—that the Founding Fathers wanted; his
> > > disregard for the Constitutions limits on the scope of government; his
> > > assuming 'dictatorial' powers (with his Czars, executive orders, and
> > > court challenges to fair practices); his wrongly supposing that he was
> > > "elected" by those he BRIBED with "gifts, stuff and entitlements"; and
> > > his refusal to consider his constantly increasing taxes and
> > > expenditures as a threat to the social and economic survival of the
> > > USA are ALL TREASON!  Inflation under Obama has STOLEN at least $8,000
> > > per family in the USA during Obama's ILLEGAL first term in office.
> > > For that THEFT alone, he must be hanged-by-the-neck-until-dead!  —
> > > John A. Armistead — Author of the "NC" and the top patriot in the USA!
> >
> > > On Mar 11, 1:20 pm, MJ <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > Treason -- in the US -- is defined within the
> > > > Constitution. Specifically, AIIIS3C1:
> > > > Treason against the United States shall consist
> > > > only in levying War against them, or in adhering
> > > > to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No
> > > > Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on
> > > > the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt
> > > > Act, or on Confession in open Court.
> > > > The Tyrant Lincoln, for instance EPITOMIZES this definition.
> >
> > > > As has been pointed out numerous times, the US
> > > > Constitution is an agreement between Sovereign
> > > > States. The Senate half of the Legislature was to
> > > > represent the States (Am 17 violates Article V).
> > > > The Constitution itself is CHANGED by the
> > > > Sovereign States' (legislature) consent. The
> > > > Executive is CHOSEN by Electors selected in
> > > > whatever manner decided upon by the STATE Legislatures.
> >
> > > > Regard$,
> > > > --MJ
> >
> > > > "Media figure Steve Deace says in his latest
> > > > column, "A good example of contractual rights
> > > > would be the U.S. Constitution, which begins with
> > > > the words, 'We the people of the United States in
> > > > order to form a more perfect union.' Immediately
> > > > the parties involved in the contract are
> > > > established: the people, the states, and the
> > > > federal government (or union). From there each
> > > > party states in the contract the terms,
> > > > jurisdictions, and liabilities each are
> > > > responsible for and permitted to perform." He is
> > > > mistaken here in two ways. First, the Federal
> > > > Government is not a party to the Constitution,
> > > > which created the Federal Government, any more
> > > > than an individual can be a party to his own
> > > > conception; second, the people and the states are
> > > > the same, as James Madison explained in his
> > > > "Report of 1800." He there explained that the
> > > > word "states" can have any of three
> > > > significations: it can refer to the territory of
> > > > a state, as in "I am presently in the state of
> > > > Connecticut"; it can refer to the government of a
> > > > state, as in, "The policy of the state of New
> > > > York is that the speed limit on interstate
> > > > highways is 65 m.p.h.; and it can refer to the
> > > > sovereign people of a state, as in, "The state of
> > > > Virginia ratified the Constitution."
> >
> > > > "The parties to the Constitution are the states,
> > > > in that third Madisonian sense of the word "state."" -- Kevin Gutzman
> >
> > > > At 09:47 PM 3/10/2013, you wrote:>Dear Bruce M.:  NO!  Obama should
> be HANGED for TREASON!!!
> > > > >Impeachment is a practically unworkable and weak process that is one
> > > > >of the three major errors of the Founding Fathers.  The other two?
> > > > >Allowing the low population states to BRIBE the Constitutional
> > > > >Convention into having a non-Representative (population
> proportional)
> > > > >US Senate.  And... Allowing Congress to make its own rules without
> > > > >stipulating that all rules must be consistent with Fairness and
> parity
> > > > >of voting power that is the very SPIRIT of the entire Constitution!
> > > > >By the latter immutable standards there can be no "leaders" of
> > > > >Congress; no greater power to those with seniority; no determination
> > > > >of chairmanships of committees depending on the winning party; and
> > > > >nothing else that "divides the house down the aisle"!  Political
> > > > >parties are the antithesis of a FAIR Representative Republic!  I
> > > > >should know, because I've penned and polished our 'New Constitution
> of
> > > > >the United States of America'—an updated, strengthened, clarified
> and
> > > > >expanded Big Brother of the original weak Constitution, that is, at
> > > > >this moment, the ONLY active document capable of solving every
> > > > >governmental and socioeconomic problem in America!  Having a
> liberated
> > > > >Fair free enterprise Capitalist system should increase the
> prosperity
> > > > >of most Americans, left and right.  And no grannies will be pushed
> > > > >over any cliffs to do it!  — John A. Armistead — Author and Patriot
> >
> > > > >On Mar 9, 6:38 pm, Bruce Majors <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > ------
> >
> > > > > >
> http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/02/07/why-obama-should-be-impeached/
> >
> > > > > > Who Will Step Up to Defend the Constitution?
> > > > > > Why Obama Should be Impeached
> > > > > > by DAVE LINDORFF
> >
> > > > > > If the Constitution is to have any relevance, and if America is
> to remain a
> > > > > > free society, then there is really no alternative: there must
> > > > > > be a bill of impeachment drawn up and submitted in the House,
> and there
> > > > > > must at least be a hearing on that bill in the House Judiciary
> > > > > > Committee.
> >
> > > > > > The disclosure, by NBC, of a so-called “white paper” by the White
> > > > > > House offering the legal justification for the executing of
> American
> > > > > > citizens solely on the authority of the executive branch and the
> > > > > > president exposes a White House so blatantly in violation of the
> > > > > > Constitution that it simply demands such a hearing....
> > > > > > Dave Lindorff is a  founder of This Can’t Be Happening and a
> > > > > > contributor to Hopeless: Barack Obama and the Politics of
> Illusion,
> > > > > > published by AK Press. Hopeless is also available in a Kindle
> edition. He
> > > > > > lives in Philadelphia.
> > > > > > --
>
> --
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "PoliticalForum" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>


-- 
brine
http://brineb.blogspot.com/

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to