Where we obviously differ John, is that I reject the notion that we are in some type of second revolution. That the rule of law has broken down completely in this Nation.
Like you, I am disappointed, dismayed, and obviously this is not the Nation that you and I grew up in. I detest the socialist movement in this Nation, and just about everything that President Obama stands for. Having said that, we are still a Nation of laws....A Nation that is the strongest in the world; the United States still leads in most every economic indicator; we are the world's only Super Power. Our President still represents the free world as we know it. I didn't like it when Presidents Reagan, Bush, Clinton, or Bush II were trashed unmercifully by predominately far left extremists, and it ain't all that becoming coming out of your pie hole either. On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 10:34 PM, NoEinstein <[email protected]>wrote: > Dear Guys: There is no "code" that can validate a traitor, Manchurial > Candidate, who like Victoria Jackson sings: "Though I sing like a > mouse, there is a communist in the White House!" No code nor law can > be constitution that elevates any person, including our twice falsely- > elected 'president', to be above the law. If that were so, he could > not be impeached, either. But not to fear; we are in the middle of > the 2nd American Revolution—this time against socialism. I can assure > you that there shall be no trials of out-and-out traitors. Oh, and > one more thing: If as you say, the 'government' has the authority to > kill anyone threatening the 'president', then the government can start > killing every conservative. It will be they that bring Obama down, > more than me! — John A. Armistead — AKA NoEinstein (note the NO...) > > On Mar 16, 9:47 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes Brine, what Einstein purports is in violation of Title 18 United > States > > Code Section 871.On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Brian Bednarek < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Threatening to hang the President and others??? Sounds like an hangable > > > offense to me!!! I was always told you are not allowed to threaten the > > > President!!! > > > > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 4:49 PM, NoEinstein <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > > >> Dear Plainol...: Obama shall be hanged from out of the door and steps > > >> of the official Presidential Helicopter, with a "rescue" beam being > > >> used as the attachment point for the rope. As a former Boy Scout, I > > >> myself will tie the neck-breaking knot. But I won't go on that (or > > >> any) helicopter. The hanging will take place at high noon about 300 > > >> feet above the Washington Mall reflection pools. After the hanging, > > >> the helicopter shall circle the Washington monument so that the > > >> million or so expected spectators can get to see what TRAITORS can > > >> expect. Then, while lead weights are slid down to Obama's body, which > > >> will be hanging about eight feet below the helicopter, he shall be > > >> flow our to sea and over deep international waters where the rope will > > >> be cut and Obama's body allowed to fall into the deep Atlantic to feed > > >> the hungry crabs. The same fate will await Michelle Obama, unless she > > >> "wises up" and stops being Obama's smiling smoke-screen before the > > >> liberal media. So far, there are seven on the list of traitors to be > > >> hanged, including Bill and Hillary Clinton. Any questions? — John A. > > >> Armistead — > > > > >> On Mar 12, 4:35 pm, plainolamerican <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >> > he must be hanged-by-the-neck-until-dead > > >> > --- > > >> > who do you think should have the honor of hanging him? > > > > >> > On Mar 12, 3:10 pm, NoEinstein <[email protected]> wrote:> > Dear > > >> MJ: You are smarter than this! Obama's destroying of our free > > >> > > enterprise capitalist system—that the Founding Fathers wanted; his > > >> > > disregard for the Constitutions limits on the scope of > government; his > > >> > > assuming 'dictatorial' powers (with his Czars, executive orders, > and > > >> > > court challenges to fair practices); his wrongly supposing that > he was > > >> > > "elected" by those he BRIBED with "gifts, stuff and > entitlements"; and > > >> > > his refusal to consider his constantly increasing taxes and > > >> > > expenditures as a threat to the social and economic survival of > the > > >> > > USA are ALL TREASON! Inflation under Obama has STOLEN at least > $8,000 > > >> > > per family in the USA during Obama's ILLEGAL first term in office. > > >> > > For that THEFT alone, he must be hanged-by-the-neck-until-dead! — > > >> > > John A. Armistead — Author of the "NC" and the top patriot in the > USA! > > > > >> > > On Mar 11, 1:20 pm, MJ <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> > > > Treason -- in the US -- is defined within the > > >> > > > Constitution. Specifically, AIIIS3C1: > > >> > > > Treason against the United States shall consist > > >> > > > only in levying War against them, or in adhering > > >> > > > to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No > > >> > > > Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on > > >> > > > the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt > > >> > > > Act, or on Confession in open Court. > > >> > > > The Tyrant Lincoln, for instance EPITOMIZES this definition. > > > > >> > > > As has been pointed out numerous times, the US > > >> > > > Constitution is an agreement between Sovereign > > >> > > > States. The Senate half of the Legislature was to > > >> > > > represent the States (Am 17 violates Article V). > > >> > > > The Constitution itself is CHANGED by the > > >> > > > Sovereign States' (legislature) consent. The > > >> > > > Executive is CHOSEN by Electors selected in > > >> > > > whatever manner decided upon by the STATE Legislatures. > > > > >> > > > Regard$, > > >> > > > --MJ > > > > >> > > > "Media figure Steve Deace says in his latest > > >> > > > column, "A good example of contractual rights > > >> > > > would be the U.S. Constitution, which begins with > > >> > > > the words, 'We the people of the United States in > > >> > > > order to form a more perfect union.' Immediately > > >> > > > the parties involved in the contract are > > >> > > > established: the people, the states, and the > > >> > > > federal government (or union). From there each > > >> > > > party states in the contract the terms, > > >> > > > jurisdictions, and liabilities each are > > >> > > > responsible for and permitted to perform." He is > > >> > > > mistaken here in two ways. First, the Federal > > >> > > > Government is not a party to the Constitution, > > >> > > > which created the Federal Government, any more > > >> > > > than an individual can be a party to his own > > >> > > > conception; second, the people and the states are > > >> > > > the same, as James Madison explained in his > > >> > > > "Report of 1800." He there explained that the > > >> > > > word "states" can have any of three > > >> > > > significations: it can refer to the territory of > > >> > > > a state, as in "I am presently in the state of > > >> > > > Connecticut"; it can refer to the government of a > > >> > > > state, as in, "The policy of the state of New > > >> > > > York is that the speed limit on interstate > > >> > > > highways is 65 m.p.h.; and it can refer to the > > >> > > > sovereign people of a state, as in, "The state of > > >> > > > Virginia ratified the Constitution." > > > > >> > > > "The parties to the Constitution are the states, > > >> > > > in that third Madisonian sense of the word "state."" -- Kevin > > >> Gutzman > > > > >> > > > At 09:47 PM 3/10/2013, you wrote:>Dear Bruce M.: NO! Obama > should > > >> be HANGED for TREASON!!! > > >> > > > >Impeachment is a practically unworkable and weak process that > is > > >> one > > >> > > > >of the three major errors of the Founding Fathers. The other > two? > > >> > > > >Allowing the low population states to BRIBE the Constitutional > > >> > > > >Convention into having a non-Representative (population > > >> proportional) > > >> > > > >US Senate. And... Allowing Congress to make its own rules > without > > >> > > > >stipulating that all rules must be consistent with Fairness and > > >> parity > > >> > > > >of voting power that is the very SPIRIT of the entire > Constitution! > > >> > > > >By the latter immutable standards there can be no "leaders" of > > >> > > > >Congress; no greater power to those with seniority; no > > >> determination > > >> > > > >of chairmanships of committees depending on the winning party; > and > > >> > > > >nothing else that "divides the house down the aisle"! > Political > > >> > > > >parties are the antithesis of a FAIR Representative Republic! > I > > >> > > > >should know, because I've penned and polished our 'New > > >> Constitution of > > >> > > > >the United States of America'—an updated, strengthened, > clarified > > >> and > > >> > > > >expanded Big Brother of the original weak Constitution, that > is, at > > >> > > > >this moment, the ONLY active document capable of solving every > > >> > > > >governmental and socioeconomic problem in America! Having a > > >> liberated > > >> > > > >Fair free enterprise Capitalist system should increase the > > >> prosperity > > >> > > > >of most Americans, left and right. And no grannies will be > pushed > > >> > > > >over any cliffs to do it! — John A. Armistead — Author and > Patriot > > > > >> > > > >On Mar 9, 6:38 pm, Bruce Majors <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >> > > > > > ------ > > > > >>http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/02/07/why-obama-should-be-impeached/ > > > > >> > > > > > Who Will Step Up to Defend the Constitution? > > >> > > > > > Why Obama Should be Impeached > > >> > > > > > by DAVE LINDORFF > > > > >> > > > > > If the Constitution is to have any relevance, and if > America is > > >> to remain a > > >> > > > > > free society, then there is really no alternative: there > must > > >> > > > > > be a bill of impeachment drawn up and submitted in the > House, > > >> and there > > >> > > > > > must at least be a hearing on that bill in the House > Judiciary > > >> > > > > > Committee. > > > > >> > > > > > The disclosure, by NBC, of a so-called “white paper” by the > > >> White > > >> > > > > > House offering the legal justification for the executing of > > >> American > > >> > > > > > citizens solely on the authority of the executive branch > and the > > >> > > > > > president exposes a White House so blatantly in violation > of the > > >> > > > > > Constitution that it simply demands such a hearing.... > > >> > > > > > Dave Lindorff is a founder of This Can’t Be Happening and a > > >> > > > > > contributor to Hopeless: Barack Obama and the Politics of > > >> Illusion, > > >> > > > > > published by AK Press. Hopeless is also available in a > Kindle > > >> edition. He > > >> > > > > > lives in Philadelphia. > > >> > > > > > -- > > > > >> -- > > >> -- > > >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > > >> For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > > > >> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > > >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > > >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > > > >> --- > > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > >> "PoliticalForum" group. > > >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, > send an > > >> email to [email protected]. > > >> For more options, visithttps://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > > > -- > > > brine > > >http://brineb.blogspot.com/ > > > > > -- > > > -- > > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > > > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > > > > --- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > > "PoliticalForum" group. > > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an > > > email to [email protected]. > > > For more options, visithttps://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > -- > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "PoliticalForum" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
