On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 10:27:12PM +0000, Andrew Hughes wrote: > On 13:41 Fri 14 Feb 2025, Harald Eilertsen wrote: > > > > For the record, here's the jtreg test summary for the PR i made (with > > one additional change, but nothing substantial): > > [...snip...] > > It might be worth putting the test changes in a separate PR which can > likely go in fairly easily first.
I've been thinking the same. Thanks for confirming that it's a viable approach. > It's a shame GitHub Actions doesn't > support BSD or each PR could then track these results. Yeah, we really would like to see support for FreeBSD in GitHub Actions. > > > Also, I've noticed you've already have jtreg working on FreeBSD [1] (for > > > the > > > upcoming jtreg 7.6?). But each JDK version uses different jtreg versions > > > [2]. Are you planning a jtreg port in FreeBSD for these older versions? > > > > So far I've just used the jtreg main branch to run the jdk tests, so I > > haven't thought about it. But that's a good point, and I will look into > > it. > > Do you plan to try and backport to the long-term support (LTS) > releases? I'm not sure yet, but in any case I doubt I'll go for enything older than jdk21. My focus is on the main jdk branch. Thanks, Harald Eilertsen
