I'm out of here. beecdadd...@danwin1210.de wrote:
> oh, Theo, if I were to start changing thing to the perfect OS security-wise, > it wouldn't even look like OpenBSD code anymore, but OpenBSD still best what > world have to offer > > so do you agree with my logic? at least give me that > at least tell me is this how things stand FD-wise/limit-wise/whatever, you > probably know the best out of all I e-mailed with > > no attempt yet,in future I hope,it's not a I am too lazy reason > > On Tue, January 30, 2024 3:58 pm, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > beecdadd...@danwin1210.de wrote: > > > >> I know system shares all resources including FDs > >> as far as I know there's what kernel/OS needs and is using and the rest of > >> users including but not limited to staff and daemon users/programs like > >> i2pd all I was wondering is the limit or amount of FDs and other resources > >> the rest of users of daemon can use in my head is a total amount which > >> apparently is unknown (I have been told why, but how can anyone work with > >> that? it's like relying on someone mentally unstable) which is then > >> devided, > >> kernel/OS gets all that it needs, users and daemons get the rest which IS > >> DIVIDED (in my head) until there is no more to > >> divide/give away/share am I close? > >> > >> okay maybe not make all available resources to 1 program is not how it > >> works but why not if that's the only programs that's running? I do not > >> understand if it's even possible to do what I'm asking or questioning, I am > >> not a OS dev because of reasons, but I like discussing such because I like > >> OS-dev > >> > >> > >> and just because what I ask isn't how it works doesn't mean it's bad? it > >> could mean > > > > You've been provided with all the source code. > > > > > > Where is your attempt to change things? > > > > > > > >
