If you actually thought you knew what you were talking about, you wouldn’t feel the need to insert “I’m not an OS Dev” after everything you say
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 11:05 AM <beecdadd...@danwin1210.de> wrote: > oh, Theo, if I were to start changing thing to the perfect OS > security-wise, > it wouldn't even look like OpenBSD code anymore, but OpenBSD still best > what > world have to offer > > so do you agree with my logic? at least give me that > at least tell me is this how things stand FD-wise/limit-wise/whatever, you > probably know the best out of all I e-mailed with > > no attempt yet,in future I hope,it's not a I am too lazy reason > > On Tue, January 30, 2024 3:58 pm, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > beecdadd...@danwin1210.de wrote: > > > >> I know system shares all resources including FDs > >> as far as I know there's what kernel/OS needs and is using and the rest > of > >> users including but not limited to staff and daemon users/programs like > >> i2pd all I was wondering is the limit or amount of FDs and other > resources > >> the rest of users of daemon can use in my head is a total amount which > >> apparently is unknown (I have been told why, but how can anyone work > with > >> that? it's like relying on someone mentally unstable) which is then > devided, > >> kernel/OS gets all that it needs, users and daemons get the rest which > IS > >> DIVIDED (in my head) until there is no more to > >> divide/give away/share am I close? > >> > >> okay maybe not make all available resources to 1 program is not how it > >> works but why not if that's the only programs that's running? I do not > >> understand if it's even possible to do what I'm asking or questioning, > I am > >> not a OS dev because of reasons, but I like discussing such because I > like > >> OS-dev > >> > >> > >> and just because what I ask isn't how it works doesn't mean it's bad? it > >> could mean > > > > You've been provided with all the source code. > > > > > > Where is your attempt to change things? > > > > > > > > >
