Did anyone pick this up?
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 01:02:03PM -0700, Vortechz wrote:
>
> I wouldn't *submit* a non-working port, but here is a tarball for anyone who
> is interested.
>
> http://www.nabble.com/file/p11676042/unofficial_wine_0.9.38_port_for_obsd4.1release.tar.gz
> unofficial_wine_0.9.38_port_for_obsd4.1release.tar.gz
>
> I don't have time to improve this further, so good luck to everyone trying
> this.
>
> // Vortechz
>
>
> steven mestdagh wrote:
> >
> > Vortechz [2007-06-22, 09:22:47]:
> >>
> >> The wine port will not be submitted for quite some time since there are
> >> problems with threading and
> >
> > It is not forbidden to submit a tarball of a non-working port.
> > That way, all your efforts which are currently scattered over a bunch of
> > e-mails, are instantly available as a starting point, and it becomes much
> > easier for people interested in helping out with the remaining problems
> > to get involved.
> >
> >> signal handling. Also, the original effort was made on 4.1-release and
> >> doesn't take into account some
> >> issues that apparently come up in -current with xenocara.
> >>
> >> To all who replied, I thank you for your interest.
> >>
> >> The port is not completely dead, but there won't be much work done,
> >> except maybe trying to get wine to run on librthread/RTHREADS.
> >> I hope that rthreads can get around the undefined behaviour in
> >> /usr/src/lib/libpthread/uthread/uthread_sigaltstack.c, causing EINVAL (I
> >> won't change libpthread!).
> >>
> >> Please correct me if you know better.
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Join-the-effort%3A-Porting-wine-0.9.38-tf3892781.html#a11676042
> Sent from the openbsd user - ports mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
