On 7/23/07, Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Did anyone pick this up?
not that I know of On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 01:02:03PM -0700, Vortechz wrote:
> > I wouldn't *submit* a non-working port, but here is a tarball for anyone who > is interested. > > http://www.nabble.com/file/p11676042/unofficial_wine_0.9.38_port_for_obsd4.1release.tar.gz > unofficial_wine_0.9.38_port_for_obsd4.1release.tar.gz > > I don't have time to improve this further, so good luck to everyone trying > this. > > // Vortechz > > > steven mestdagh wrote: > > > > Vortechz [2007-06-22, 09:22:47]: > >> > >> The wine port will not be submitted for quite some time since there are > >> problems with threading and > > > > It is not forbidden to submit a tarball of a non-working port. > > That way, all your efforts which are currently scattered over a bunch of > > e-mails, are instantly available as a starting point, and it becomes much > > easier for people interested in helping out with the remaining problems > > to get involved. > > > >> signal handling. Also, the original effort was made on 4.1-releaseand > >> doesn't take into account some > >> issues that apparently come up in -current with xenocara. > >> > >> To all who replied, I thank you for your interest. > >> > >> The port is not completely dead, but there won't be much work done, > >> except maybe trying to get wine to run on librthread/RTHREADS. > >> I hope that rthreads can get around the undefined behaviour in > >> /usr/src/lib/libpthread/uthread/uthread_sigaltstack.c, causing EINVAL (I > >> won't change libpthread!). > >> > >> Please correct me if you know better. > > > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Join-the-effort%3A-Porting-wine-0.9.38-tf3892781.html#a11676042 > Sent from the openbsd user - ports mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >