On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 06:46:47PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: > > trinity might be a good intermediate point. It's still a lot of work, as > > the build system is radically different from kde3, so it requires creating > > new ports (but you can probably lift most of the useful code from kde3). > > > > (for those that don't know, trinity is supposed to be kde3 ported to qt4, > > thus requiring one single qt for both kde3 and kde4). > > *Meep* Wrong. Atm, trinity 3.5.13.1 is still in Qt3 (and trinity took > over Qt3 maintainership unofficially from nokia). The Qt4 port is far > from complete and quite stalled, see > http://www.trinitydesktop.org/wiki/bin/view/Developers/RoadMap > 3.5.14/port to qt4 was originally expected this fall.
Nope, I'm going to nitpick, but what I said was factually *right*. I know you sometimes have problems with english, but notice the trinity is SUPPOSED to be kde3 ported to qt4... (emphasis added for clarity) I'm perfectly aware that work wasn't finished last time I looked...
