2012/11/13 Marc Espie <es...@nerim.net>: > On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 09:04:40PM +0300, Vadim Zhukov wrote: >> >From the other side, slower archs probably will use XFCE, LXDE or >> something custom... Unfortunately I do not have access to anything but >> i386 now. :( > I know some people who are "just" using konqueror from kde3 for quick > browsing on simple sites. I'm not kidding. It's still a very fast all-purpose > browser. > >> >> 1) adjust kde3 with /usr/local/kde3/* (i.e include, libs, bin) + have >> >> kde4 with /usr/local/kde4/*. both independent. is it too hard to add >> >> this for kde3? >> > I don't know. You tell me. >> >> Not too hard for KDE 4. But I still hope to find better way than this >> "/opt"-ism. >> >> My personal goal is to make KDE 4 co-build with KDE 3, and to make >> libs and pimlibs from KDE 4 co-exist with KDE 3. But I didn't even >> started moving in that direction, there is too much other work. > > I did a bit of that work, like actually moving the kde3 libs out of the > way into /usr/local/lib/kde3... having kde3 use libtool also helps picking > up the right libraries (I have to fix the one kde package that still wants > gnu libtool though). > > I won't object to *finishing* that in tree *if we have a plan*. That means, > preferably import the kde4 parts after the directories are mapped out so > that there's little conflict with kde3. > >> I have some crazy ideas like porting KDE3 to CMake, but before talking >> loud about them sound I should try to try starting myself. > > No, that's crazy. You said trinity was hard to do. Changing kde3 to cmake > more or less requires redoing what the kde people did between kde3 and kde4 > and that was a LOT of work. > > *most* of the autoconf stuff in kde3 is reasonably easy to move around. It > may require testing, obviously...
I should note that CMake evolved a LOT from KDE 4.0 till now. And KDE developers worked hard on this. So porting KDE 3 will re-use a lot of stuff we already have in CMake. Another side note: KDE 4 just moves to CMake 2.8.8 from CMake 2.6. Why not CMake 2.8.9? - because many Linux distros lacks fresh CMake, he-he... -- WBR, Vadim Zhukov
