On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 03:02:37PM +0100, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: > On 14 Aug 2015, at 15:40, Anil Madhavapeddy <a...@recoil.org> wrote: > > > > On 3 Aug 2015, at 18:58, Anil Madhavapeddy <a...@recoil.org> wrote: > >> > >> This rather large ports diff does an update of the OCaml ports to 4.02.3: > >> http://www.recoil.org/~avsm/openbsd-patches/ocaml-4.02.3.patch.txt > >> > >> It bumps the REVISION of most of the untouched OCaml ports since binary > >> compat is not preserved across OCaml revisions. > >> > >> Any tests on non-x86 would be appreciated, especially ARM with native code. > > > > Here's a followup OCaml 4.02.3 patch that is now suitable for wider testing. > > I've run it on amd64 and sparc64 and am doing a complete bulk rebuild that > > isn't > > complete yet. > > > > Full patch: > > http://www.recoil.org/~avsm/openbsd-patches/ocaml-4.02.3-2.patch.txt > > > > And here's a third patchset with some fixes thanks to a bulk build by krw > http://recoil.org/~avsm/openbsd-patches/ocaml-4.02.3-3.patch.txt > > There's only one known failure now in ocaml-camlimages, and the rest all > builds on sparc64 as well. > > -a
I built coccinelle on armv7 with the -2 version of the patch without problem. It appears this is not native as infrastructure/mk/arch-defines.mk has: OCAML_NATIVE_ARCHS = i386 sparc amd64 OCAML_NATIVE_DYNLINK_ARCHS = i386 amd64 ? I'm not really in a position to do a bulk build but if there is some sort of ocaml regression test or the like you'd like run let me know.
