On 17 August 2015 at 15:37, Kenneth Westerback <kwesterb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 17 August 2015 at 15:30, Anil Madhavapeddy <a...@recoil.org> wrote: >> On 16 Aug 2015, at 09:18, Jonathan Gray <j...@jsg.id.au> wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, >>> >>> I built coccinelle on armv7 with the -2 version of the patch without >>> problem. It appears this is not native as >>> infrastructure/mk/arch-defines.mk has: >>> OCAML_NATIVE_ARCHS = i386 sparc amd64 >>> OCAML_NATIVE_DYNLINK_ARCHS = i386 amd64 >>> ? >>> >>> I'm not really in a position to do a bulk build but if there is some >>> sort of ocaml regression test or the like you'd like run let me know. >> >> Thanks! After your and krw's tests, the final -4 patchset here should >> build all the ports on everything: >> >> http://recoil.org/~avsm/openbsd-patches/ocaml-4.02.3-4.patch.txt >> >> OCaml does support ARM native code, but our port currently doesn't >> use it until the configure glue is in. I'll have a followup patch >> to enable this, but got sidetracked with compiling up a custom u-Boot >> for my Cubieboard2 since the current snapshots don't seem to boot >> successfully on it. For now, the portable bytecode is sufficient >> (but there aren't any interesting ARM-specific regress tests until >> native code support lands). >> >> Would a ports person be able to give me an ok to commit the patchset? >> >> -a > > Firing up -4 on my i386 test box while you wait for the ports@ ok. :-) > > What was the issue with ocaml-camlimage? > > .... Ken
i386 bulk build finished with no problems. Well, no problems related to ocaml. Just my usual tmpfs losing a file or two issues. :-) .... Ken
