On 17 August 2015 at 15:30, Anil Madhavapeddy <a...@recoil.org> wrote:
> On 16 Aug 2015, at 09:18, Jonathan Gray <j...@jsg.id.au> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun,
>>
>> I built coccinelle on armv7 with the -2 version of the patch without
>> problem.  It appears this is not native as
>> infrastructure/mk/arch-defines.mk has:
>> OCAML_NATIVE_ARCHS = i386 sparc amd64
>> OCAML_NATIVE_DYNLINK_ARCHS = i386 amd64
>> ?
>>
>> I'm not really in a position to do a bulk build but if there is some
>> sort of ocaml regression test or the like you'd like run let me know.
>
> Thanks!  After your and krw's tests, the final -4 patchset here should
> build all the ports on everything:
>
> http://recoil.org/~avsm/openbsd-patches/ocaml-4.02.3-4.patch.txt
>
> OCaml does support ARM native code, but our port currently doesn't
> use it until the configure glue is in.  I'll have a followup patch
> to enable this, but got sidetracked with compiling up a custom u-Boot
> for my Cubieboard2 since the current snapshots don't seem to boot
> successfully on it.  For now, the portable bytecode is sufficient
> (but there aren't any interesting ARM-specific regress tests until
> native code support lands).
>
> Would a ports person be able to give me an ok to commit the patchset?
>
> -a

Firing up -4 on my i386 test box while you wait for the ports@ ok. :-)

What was the issue with ocaml-camlimage?

.... Ken

Reply via email to