On 17 August 2015 at 15:30, Anil Madhavapeddy <a...@recoil.org> wrote: > On 16 Aug 2015, at 09:18, Jonathan Gray <j...@jsg.id.au> wrote: >> >> On Sun, >> >> I built coccinelle on armv7 with the -2 version of the patch without >> problem. It appears this is not native as >> infrastructure/mk/arch-defines.mk has: >> OCAML_NATIVE_ARCHS = i386 sparc amd64 >> OCAML_NATIVE_DYNLINK_ARCHS = i386 amd64 >> ? >> >> I'm not really in a position to do a bulk build but if there is some >> sort of ocaml regression test or the like you'd like run let me know. > > Thanks! After your and krw's tests, the final -4 patchset here should > build all the ports on everything: > > http://recoil.org/~avsm/openbsd-patches/ocaml-4.02.3-4.patch.txt > > OCaml does support ARM native code, but our port currently doesn't > use it until the configure glue is in. I'll have a followup patch > to enable this, but got sidetracked with compiling up a custom u-Boot > for my Cubieboard2 since the current snapshots don't seem to boot > successfully on it. For now, the portable bytecode is sufficient > (but there aren't any interesting ARM-specific regress tests until > native code support lands). > > Would a ports person be able to give me an ok to commit the patchset? > > -a
Firing up -4 on my i386 test box while you wait for the ports@ ok. :-) What was the issue with ocaml-camlimage? .... Ken
