On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 09:07:46AM -0600, attila wrote: > > attila <att...@stalphonsos.com> writes: > > > attila <att...@stalphonsos.com> writes: > > > >> attila <att...@stalphonsos.com> writes: > >> > >>> attila <att...@stalphonsos.com> writes: > >>> > >>>> attila <att...@stalphonsos.com> writes: > >>>> > >>>>> Hi ports@, > >>>>> > >>>>> I have been informed that my previous email re Tor Browser Bundle was > >>>>> malformed: the Content-Type header on the message says text/plain but > >>>>> should be multipart/mixed, which causes many (most?) MUAs to throw up > >>>>> all over it. I'm not sure where the fault lies yet, and apologize for > >>>>> the screwed up attachment. > >>>>> > >>>>> In the interests of simplicity and efficacy the tarball can be found > >>>>> here: http://bits.haqistan.net/~attila/tbb.tgz > >>>>> > >>>>> Sorry. > >>>>> > >>>>> Pax, -A > >>>> > >>>> I've updated http://bits.haqistan.net/~attila/tbb.tgz with the > >>>> just-completed update to Tor Browser 4.5.3. Tested on amd64. > >>>> > >>>> So... update & ping. > >>>> > >>>> Pax, -A > >>> > >>> Reupdate & reping: > >>> > >>> I brought the ports up to the current version, which is now 5.0.3. > >>> I've also solved my attachment woes; updated ports attached (URL above > >>> has new bits as well). Tested on amd64. There are packages available > >>> for testing at: > >>> http://mirrors.nycbug.org/pub/snapshots/packages/amd64/ > >>> The README file there might be helpful if you want to test. > >>> > >>> FWIW, the GH repository is: https://github.com/torbsd/openbsd-ports > >>> YMMV. > >>> > >>> Pax, -A > >> > >> Re-reupdate & re-reping: > >> > >> Thanks to Daniel Jakots for pointing out that the inter-package > >> dependencies were all balled up and led to problems. Updated ports > >> attached with better deps, updated packages for testing available at > >> the nycbug URL, above. > >> > >> Pax, -A > > > > Re*ping. I know some people have been using the packages we put up > > for testing purposes. I also know this is potentially sort of a > > controversial (set of) port(s) and that everyone is busy but if anyone > > could be troubled to take a look and give some feedback that would > > be great. > > > > Attaching the latest version of the ports for completeness. > > > > Pax, -A > > Ping.
I had a quick look a while ago at the Makefile. I would *really* prefer you to shrink it by reusing www/mozilla MODULE, provided you work out the correct changes that would be needed for tbb without breaking the other users of the module. Instead of copy-pasting-cargo-culting what's in the module... Is the .mozconfig hackery really needed ? The @exec lines in the PLIST should go at the bottom. I think you dont need files/firefox.desktop, and do you really need files/profiles.ini ? Have you tried leaving the .xpi files compressed in their respective dirs at runtime (eventually unzipping/patching/rezipping) as you comment in Makefile.inc line 68 ? Iirc this should also work and is 'nicer' to the filesystem.. I'm still not a fan of having this in-tree, but i'd like opinions from other porters & tor users (users, not fanboys please) here - especially pascal since he's the tor maintainer :) Landry
