On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 04:53:36PM +0100, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote: > Landry Breuil said: > > I'm still not a fan of having this in-tree, but i'd like opinions from > > other porters & tor users (users, not fanboys please) here > > I am both, and I agree that this port should be kept as close to other > mozilla ports as possible. Also, I don't like pkgpaths www/tbb/noscript > and www/tbb/https-everywhere: these extensions are not tbb-specific.
Well, the way they're installed under lib/tor-browser-5.0.3/extensions, they're only accessible by tbb. 'globally accessible' extensions should go into /usr/local/lib/mozilla/extensions/ (like enigmail does) but last i looked at this, it wasnt working perfectly, since you need to put the ext in app-specific subdir with appgid, defeating the purpose of making it accessible to all potential users (declared in install.rdf). I know some linux distros use this iirc... Landry
