On Sun, Sep 06, 2020 at 02:33:12AM +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > On Sat, Sep 05 2020, Edd Barrett <e...@theunixzoo.co.uk> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > We've been talking about trying to remove security/gnupg (i.e. gpg > > version 1) for some time, and the recent plist clash has given me the > > kick up the butt I needed to look more seriously at this. > > > > Below is a list of things that still depend upon gpg1, by maintainer, as > > determined by: > > > > select fullpkgpath from ports where build_depends glob > > '*security/gnupg[^2]*' or run_depends glob '*security/gnupg[^2]*' order by > > maintainer; > > This doesn't catch everything.
My small pkg_whatrequires function gives me this list: $ pkg_whatrequires security/gnupg mail/pine-pgp-filters|build security/fwknop|build security/p5-GPG|build security/p5-GnuPG-Interface|build security/p5-Module-Signature|build security/p5-PGP-Sign|build security/py-gnupg,python3|build security/py-gnupg|build www/rt|build databases/mysql-zrm|run mail/mailpile|run mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin|run mail/pine-pgp-filters|run security/clamav-unofficial-sigs|run security/fwknop|run security/gpgme,,-main|run security/gpgme,,-qt|run security/gpgme,-main|run security/gpgme,-qt|run security/gpgme|run security/p5-GPG|run security/p5-GnuPG-Interface|run security/p5-GnuPG|run security/p5-Module-Signature|run security/p5-PGP-Sign|run security/py-gnupg,python3|run security/py-gnupg|run security/tclgpg|run www/rt|run www/weboob|run mail/mailpile|test mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin|test net/py-slixmpp,python3|test security/p5-GPG|test security/p5-GnuPG-Interface|test security/p5-GnuPG|test security/p5-Module-Signature|test security/p5-PGP-Sign|test security/py-gnupg,python3|test security/py-gnupg|test security/tclgpg|test -- Antoine
