On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 7:39 AM, Wietse Venema <wie...@porcupine.org> wrote: > To prove that the difference in behavior is caused by the presence > or absence of .procmailrc files, you need to deliver mail to the > EXACT SAME user and change NOTHING except the presence/existence > of the .procmailrc file. >
Doh! Yes, when I move the .procmailrc out of the way postfix/local still delivers as /usr/bin/procmail. I also found one account that has a .procmailrc and it is delivering to command according to mailbox_command, procmail -a "$EXTENSION". The difference is not caused by the presence or absence of the .procmailrc files. The almost 100% correlation must be nothing more than a coincidence. Yesterday I asked about this on IRC and somone had the faq bot display the local_transport postconf documentation. I verified that my local_transport, transport_maps, and all other *transport* parameters were the default values, and that all of my users are local. I found a post that seemed similar to my problem [1] but the way they described it working seemed backwards from the documentation and other posts [2]. [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-user-ger...@lists.debian.org/msg37310.html [2] http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2004-07/0805.html There must be some difference in the mapping or something between accounts or some mapping or aliasing that makes this happen, but I am at a loss to know what it is. I might have a better chance if I knew where /usr/bin/procmail was being picked up from. -- Jacob Anawalt
