On 1/11/2009, Victor Duchovni (victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com) wrote: >> First question... is there a reason that none of the *_limit_maps are >> included in proxy_read_maps by default? I.e., maybe doing this is not >> recommended?
> Ask the maintainers of the unofficial VDA quota patch. I didn't know I was using that patch, but considering your reply, apparently the *_limit_maps are a sure sign of it? I'm on gentoo, and have the vda USE flag explicitly DISABLED... Hmmm... closer examination shows that I am not actually using this patch OR table, since it (the Table) doesn't show up in postconf -n output, even though it is specified in main.cf. This system was originally set up by someone else, so they must have set this, and I just never noticed it, since I have not actually implemented quotas yet - although I've been toying with the idea, which is why I had not commented out those lines in main.cf... I've been planning on switching this installation over to dovecot soon anyway for POP/IMAP access, so will just use the dovecot LDA and quota plug-in if/when I decide to implement quotas... > There is as-yet no support for "+=" in main.cf parameter settings. Ok, thanks for the confirmation... -- Best regards, Charles
