On 13/01/2009, at 11:44, wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote:
David Cottle:
On 13/01/2009, at 10:13, wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote:
David Cottle:
Content-Description: Undelivered Message
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Received: from server.engineering.idb (unknown [127.0.0.1])
by server.engineering.idb (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3F5B13C002D
for <webmas...@aus-city.com>; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 23:43:36 +0000
(UTC)
Received-SPF: none (no valid SPF record)
Received: from hosting.mgapi.edu (unknown [82.179.217.2])
by server.engineering.idb (Postfix) with SMTP
for <webmas...@aus-city.com>; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 23:43:35 +0000
(UTC)
Received: from dpkpyv (181.138.153.218)
by hosting.mgapi.edu; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 02:43:44 +0300
..
Hi Wietse,
Sorry I am now totally confused as webmas...@aus-city.com is not
invalid it's this address!
If webmas...@aus-city.com is valid, then the problem is that
your own system is returning mail for webmas...@aus-city.com
as undeliverable.
That problem has NOTHING to do with spam.
Wietse
Hi Wietse,
Sorry that is incorrect I am not sending out Viagra emails. I look at
all these bounces and I did not send one of these single emails. My
SMTP is closed and not an open relay either.
Now you see my questions I am perplexed at how to stop these. Qmail
somehow dealt with these I never saw them in queue. But I believe
postfix is a better program!
So they are indeed spam bounces.
Also how many could be being sent out that do get delivered?
But as I also said all these bounces i see they are stuck in queue as
they are not deliverable.
So can rules like you use for someone sending out an email on the
server as a user be applied to postmaster of bounces?
Simply test the recipients if invalid reject and it's resolved so
filer bounces.
Else can a postfix command be issued to delete only undeliverable
bounces only from mailerdaemon at my server in the queue? I can run
this by cron.
It seems crazy for me to log in daily into plesk, tick all these in
the mail queue and delete them manually.
Thanks!