On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:17:29PM -0400, Matt Hayes wrote:
> Linux Addict wrote:
> > Dear Group, I am modifying my recipient restrictions to displayed below.
> > I referred many documents to compile the options. I want you experts to
> > once verify it for me.
> >
> > smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
> > reject_non_fqdn_sender,
> > reject_non_fqdn_recipient,
> > reject_unknown_sender_domain,
> > reject_unknown_recipient_domain,
> > permit_mynetworks,
> > permit_sasl_authenticated,
> > reject_unauth_destination,
> > reject_unlisted_recipient,
> > reject_invalid_hostname,
> > reject_invalid_helo_hostname
> > reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname
> > reject_unauth_pipelining,
> > reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname
> > reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org <http://zen.spamhaus.org>,
> > reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net <http://bl.spamcop.net>,
> > permit
> >
> > Thank you
> > ~LA
>
>
> I would suggest moving permit_sasl_authenticated to the top of that
> list. Either that or using the submission service for SASL
> authenticated users
THere is not much point in acceping invalid sender and recipient addresses
from MUAs. The restriction is fine where it is.
--
Viktor.
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>
If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
