On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Victor Duchovni < [email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:17:29PM -0400, Matt Hayes wrote: > > > Linux Addict wrote: > > > Dear Group, I am modifying my recipient restrictions to displayed > below. > > > I referred many documents to compile the options. I want you experts to > > > once verify it for me. > > > > > > smtpd_recipient_restrictions = > > > reject_non_fqdn_sender, > > > reject_non_fqdn_recipient, > > > reject_unknown_sender_domain, > > > reject_unknown_recipient_domain, > > > permit_mynetworks, > > > permit_sasl_authenticated, > > > reject_unauth_destination, > > > reject_unlisted_recipient, > > > reject_invalid_hostname, > > > reject_invalid_helo_hostname > > > reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname > > > reject_unauth_pipelining, > > > reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname > > > reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org <http://zen.spamhaus.org>, > > > reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net <http://bl.spamcop.net>, > > > permit > > > > > > Thank you > > > ~LA > > > > > > I would suggest moving permit_sasl_authenticated to the top of that > > list. Either that or using the submission service for SASL > > authenticated users > > THere is not much point in acceping invalid sender and recipient addresses > from MUAs. The restriction is fine where it is. > > -- > Viktor. > > Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. > Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header. > > To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit > http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below: > <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users> > > If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not > send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put > "It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly. > The reason I moved below is there seems to be some rogue hosts/users(Mostly things like "Refer a Link") misusing the priority and injecting spam.
