On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:05:58AM -0400, Rick Duval wrote:
> Sorry, I did send it in an earlier post, here it is again.
>
> Apr 22 13:52:54 vps04 postfix/smtpd[16215]: connect from unknown[74.51.38.172]
> Apr 22 13:52:54 vps04 postfix/smtpd[16215]: B3E982010001:
> client=unknown[74.51.38.172]
> Apr 22 13:52:54 vps04 postfix/cleanup[16219]: B3E982010001:
> message-id=<ba5fe86e59757545b1c1cb36b1492c59acd...@nelson2.nelson.local>
> Apr 22 13:52:55 vps04 postfix/qmgr[28236]: B3E982010001:
> from=<rst...@nelsonindust.com>, size=14072292, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
> Apr 22 13:52:55 vps04 postfix/smtpd[16215]: disconnect from
> unknown[74.51.38.172]
This message is accepted.
> Apr 22 13:52:56 vps04 postfix/local[16220]: B3E982010001:
> to=<rduval.csm-ltd....@vps04.manitres.net>,
> orig_to=<rdu...@csm-ltd.com>, relay=local, d$
You truncated all the interesting data from the local(8) log entry.
This message is not rejected by Postfix, and Exim could not have seen
an error in the SMTP transfer to Postfix. It could have bounced, because
the local(8) delivery failed, but you carefully hide this information.
--
Viktor.
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:majord...@postfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>
If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
