Victor Duchovni wrote, at 05/01/2009 10:26 AM: > On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 10:19:40AM -0400, Jorey Bump wrote:
FTR: No, I didn't! :) >>> My end goal here is to get this all working, and then change these ports >>> to, for example, 25 -> 2525 and 587 -> 587587 unless there is some other >>> convention. I am going to put a anti spam proxy in front of all this. > > There is no port "587587", the TCP port range (over both IPv4 and IPv6) is > from 0 to 65535, but "0" means "unspecified" at the socket API level. In > any case 587587 is usually equivalent to its residue mod 2^16 which is > 63299, not a good port to choose for a service (dynamic port range on > most systems).
