Here some details on cpanel limits:

http://forums.cpanel.net/email-exim/73464-how-does-new-max-emails-per-hour-tracking-work-2.html

2009/7/13 ad...@gg-lab.net <ad...@gg-lab.net>:
> Lucian, i saw that solution, but i want something that can globally
> limit EVERY mail sent:
>
> i'll also offer smtp access, and a sendmail wrapper isn't a solution.
>
> Benny: ok, so we are speaking about the evenlope sender, so, it seems
> this is the solution.
>
> 2009/7/13 Benny Pedersen <m...@junc.org>:
>>
>> On Mon, July 13, 2009 09:51, ad...@gg-lab.net wrote:
>>
>>> i want to limit mail sent via php mainly, so i can't limit via sasl
>>> simply because users aren't authenticated.
>>
>> remove 127.0.0.1 in mynetworks, and make sasl usage from all what got sent 
>> from this box, problem solved, next step is a policy
>> server that can handle sasl limits
>>
>> all else will fail
>>
>> another way is to seperate web and mail server so 127.0.0.1 is another box :)
>>
>>> Of course i can't limit the host ip (all mail sent from my webserver).
>>
>> as Obama says "yes we can" :)
>>
>>> The most beautiful thing would be limiting system user (each user has
>>> an entry in /etc/passwd). Limiting the sender would be unuseful,
>>> because all spammers randomiza the sender, bypassing the limit.
>>
>> randomize there from: but not envelope sender (apa...@myhostname)
>>
>> and this email is unknown in my virtual alias for good reason, apache is 
>> local and stays here at so
>>
>>> Now, i know that cPanel with Exim has a limit of this tipe. I'll
>>> request them WHAT is exactly limited (maybe we can replicate with
>>> postfix).
>>
>> dont use cpanel here so cant say how thay mix up the problem
>>
>>> I'll also write to the postfix-policyd mailing list.
>>
>> i work on something to fail2ban, will need to write some php and extend 
>> policyd 1.80 more to handle this here, point is that none
>> have done it before so when i make it, it will be the best :)
>>
>>> Sahil, maybe we can continue here? Postfixfw rules are completely in
>>> topic and maybe we can help someone else...
>>
>> exactly
>>
>> --
>> xpoint
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to