Stan Hoeppner a écrit : > mouss put forth on 3/6/2010 6:03 PM: >> Stan Hoeppner a écrit : >>> [snip] >>> A web server with a single IP address hosting 378 vitural domains. Should >>> it have 379 PTRs? One for the host itself and one for each virtual domain? >>> Of course not. >>> >>> A mail server with a single IP address hosting 378 mail domains? Should it >>> have 379 PTRs? One for the host itself and one for each virtual MX domain? >>> Of course not. In this case, the DNS infrastructure isn't smart enough to >>> return matching records even though they do exist, so why bother? >> Stan, you're confused. What is "asked" for is: > > I'm not confused at all mouss. I was mocking Greg with an absurd example of > what he espouses here: > > Greg A. Woods put forth on 3/6/2010 2:58 PM: > >> For every hostname pointing at an IP address, there should be a >> corresponding PTR for that address pointing back at the hostname. > > My example exactly matches what he says. What he says is incorrect. I was > drawing attention to his absurd suggestion with an example of absurdity. >
Ah sorry. I read it the other way...
