Le 13/03/2011 16:56, Erwan David a écrit : > Le Sun 13/03/2011, Steve disait >> >>> >>> >>> Am 13.03.2011 12:38, schrieb Steve: >>>> And today it is not big deal to cut down spam to less then 1% of the >>> inbound. >>> >>> but not only with postfix >>> >> No. Not only with postfix alone. But most of us are not only using postfix >> in their messaging infrastructure. > > And without too much collateral damages ? I can stop all spam. But how many > legitime email will I block in the same time ?
what are you are trying to say? > > Yes I can stop all spam, by cutting off all email. 100% efficiency, but also > 100% collateral damage... > come on. we do block most spam without much FPs. sure, we do block mail from residential IPs, from hosts which behave as ratenets, ... but we don't consider that to be FPs.
