Hi list,
Just by looking at the headers "Return-Path", "From:" and "To:"
one can sense that the following is spam ...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Return-Path:<access...@ms29.hinet.net>
X-Original-To: postmas...@example.com
Delivered-To: postmas...@example.com
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1])
by mail.example.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D17E557547EC
for<postmas...@example.com>; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:39:48 +0300 (EEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.example.gr
Received: from mail.example.gr ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (mail.example.gr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with LMTP id yHroNA2goYHC for<postmas...@example.com>;
Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:39:40 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [186.194.3.66] (unknown [186.194.3.66])
by mail.example.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7567357547E2
for<postmas...@example.com>; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:39:39 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [95.53.111.119] (helo=uvthdjg.mnghdffxosiys.net)
by with esmtpa (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from )
id 1MMI1H-7816uo-2U
for postmas...@example.com; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:39:39 -0300
From:<postmas...@example.com>
To:<postmas...@example.com>
Subject: Re: CV 54
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
a) helo host uvthdjg.mnghdffxosiys.net does not have an ip
b) rdns for 95.53.111.119 gives
pppoe.95-53-111-119.dynamic.lenobl.avangarddsl.ru
c) Envelope sender ie "return path" is different that From: header
d) from: and to: headers are pretending to be postmaster @ my domain.
Is there an rfc compliant way to reject this ???
Thanks in advance for your help.
Regards
Harry.
