* bsd <b...@todoo.biz>: > > Le 9 nov. 2011 à 14:24, Patrick Ben Koetter a écrit : > > > * bsd <b...@todoo.biz>: > >>> Good idea. Reject any message that can't be delivered immediately. That's > >>> cheap. It takes place in the SMTP session before the payload has been > >>> sent and > >>> before a content filter, such as amavis, does ressource intensive > >>> filtering. > >> > >> Shall I do that using the "Postfix Before-Queue Content Filter", if so is > >> It > >> feasible or do you advise me to do that in the normal SMTP server using the > >> classic "virtual_alias_maps" > > > > > > Before or After Queue Filtering depends on legal requirements and how your > > server can take the load. > > > > In Germany, for example, you have to reject in session or you will get intro > > trouble if you decide at a later stage to accept, but discard the message > > later, because to the law this means you suppress delivery - which is a > > crime > > in Germany. > > > > And, if your server is so busy that it can't process message filtering while > > the client waits for the server to accept the message, you should consider > > After Queue Filtering. > > > > As for your question regarding *_maps. Is your server a border filter (vulgo > > SMTP Gateway) which accepts messages and forwards them to other servers or > > is > > it a final destination where clients come to pick up messages? > > It is a SMTP Gateway delivering to another internal server. > In fact there are two Gateways server with equal MX weight.
Read into relay_domains and relay_recpient_maps: <http://www.postfix.org/STANDARD_CONFIGURATION_README.html#firewall> p@rick -- All technical questions asked privately will be automatically answered on the list and archived for public access unless privacy is explicitely required and justified. saslfinger (debugging SMTP AUTH): <http://postfix.state-of-mind.de/patrick.koetter/saslfinger/>