* bsd <b...@todoo.biz>:
> 
> Le 9 nov. 2011 à 14:24, Patrick Ben Koetter a écrit :
> 
> > * bsd <b...@todoo.biz>:
> >>> Good idea. Reject any message that can't be delivered immediately. That's
> >>> cheap. It takes place in the SMTP session before the payload has been 
> >>> sent and
> >>> before a content filter, such as amavis, does ressource intensive 
> >>> filtering.
> >> 
> >> Shall I do that using the "Postfix Before-Queue Content Filter", if so is 
> >> It
> >> feasible or do you advise me to do that in the normal SMTP server using the
> >> classic "virtual_alias_maps"
> > 
> > 
> > Before or After Queue Filtering depends on legal requirements and how your
> > server can take the load.
> > 
> > In Germany, for example, you have to reject in session or you will get intro
> > trouble if you decide at a later stage to accept, but discard the message
> > later, because to the law this means you suppress delivery - which is a 
> > crime
> > in Germany.
> > 
> > And, if your server is so busy that it can't process message filtering while
> > the client waits for the server to accept the message, you should consider
> > After Queue Filtering.
> > 
> > As for your question regarding *_maps. Is your server a border filter (vulgo
> > SMTP Gateway) which accepts messages and forwards them to other servers or 
> > is
> > it a final destination where clients come to pick up messages?
> 
> It is a SMTP Gateway delivering to another internal server. 
> In fact there are two Gateways server with equal MX weight. 

Read into relay_domains and relay_recpient_maps:
<http://www.postfix.org/STANDARD_CONFIGURATION_README.html#firewall>

p@rick

-- 
All technical questions asked privately will be automatically answered on the
list and archived for public access unless privacy is explicitely required and
justified.

saslfinger (debugging SMTP AUTH):
<http://postfix.state-of-mind.de/patrick.koetter/saslfinger/>

Reply via email to