-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 04/23/2013 10:42 AM, Steve Jenkins wrote:
> 
> This setup has been working pretty well for me, and reduces false 
> positives by not allowing any single DNSBL to block an incoming 
> connection without concurrence from at least one other DNSBL.
> 
First, thanks for introducing me to postscreen. Since I moved my
domains to a dedicated server in Germany, I've been getting hammered
with spam, so second, I've been testing this out, minus the mjabl
entry, and it seems to have stopped the spammers in their tracks. I'm
not going to claim it's optimum, because I don't know, but it works
*very* well.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=wFOx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to