Thanks again Wietse. > Hmm. ADDRESS_REWRITING_README describes the address manipulations > in the order as executed. Presenting these descriptions in a different > order would be misleading.
Yes. And it's very well written. But assuming or inferring information that is not in a technical document is usually not a wise move. Currently, the processing order is implied by the order mentioned in the document. But I didn't want to assume that. I would respectfully suggest an explicit statement in the document so the reader doesn't need to infer the processing order. > That would require not a switch, but a mechanism to specify the > order of all five cleanup server's address manipulations. Yes, good point. Perhaps that's too complex to address what may be a shrinking problem today (cleaning up legacy client addresses). Best regards, and thanks again for the quick help! Michael
