> On Jan 31, 2015, at 4:55 PM, LuKreme <krem...@kreme.com> wrote: > > >> On Jan 31, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Wietse Venema <wie...@porcupine.org> wrote: >> >> LuKreme: >>> Jan 26 14:49:53 mail postfix/pipe[44273]: E64DA50D3A1: >>> to=<oq6+2nbq@*munged*.com>, orig_to=<oq6_2nbq@*munged*.com>, relay=dovecot, >>> delay=0.13, delays=0.1/0.01/0/0.03, dsn=5.1.1, status=bounced (user unknown) >> >> That will produce backscatter. Why did you accept an unknown recipient? > > I don’t know, that’s what I was trying to find. > > Everything I have about queue ID E64DA50D3A1 in maillog was posted in the > original message. > > Oh, wait, i think I just found it in an old pre map. Off to test.
Yes, the old PCRE map was the problem. IN trying to fix it, I went to change the recipient_delimiter $ postfix reload postfix/postlog: fatal: bad string length 2 > 1: recipient_delimiter = +_ postsuper: fatal: bad string length 2 > 1: recipient_delimiter = +_ mail /etc/postfix] $ postconf recipient_delimiter mail_version recipient_delimiter = +_ mail_version = 2.11.3 -- Q: Does anyone know how many LOCs were in the Space Shuttle' codebase? A: 45. It was written in perl (paraphrased Slashdot discussion)
