Quanah Gibson-Mount:
> --On Tuesday, February 09, 2016 12:36 PM -0500 Viktor Dukhovni 
> <postfix-us...@dukhovni.org> wrote:
> 
> >
> >> On Feb 9, 2016, at 12:14 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount <qua...@zimbra.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Even after setting the style to "host", it still generates the incorrect
> >> netmask:
> >>
> >> [zimbra@zre-ldap003 ~]$ postconf mynetworks mynetworks_style
> >> mynetworks = 127.0.0.1/32 10.137.242.53/32 [::1]/128
> >> [fc00:10:137:242::53]/128 [fe80::250:56ff:fe8f:cbcd]/128
> >> mynetworks_style = host
> >
> > The mask is correct.  With "host" mynetworks is limited to the list of
> > interface addresses verbatim, the interface subnet mask is not used.
> 
> So this is a significant regression vs 2.x.  I need it to return valid 
> values based on what the netmask settings are for the interface.

mynetworks_style=host has always worked this way.  The difference
with mynetworks_style=subnet is intentional. Different settings
give two different results.

Just go with COMPATIBILITY_READMNE guidelines: if the new default
is not what you want, set the old default in main.cf. 

        Wietse

Reply via email to