Okay I guess it does. Meaning there are no standards for the way
emailers should respond to bounces?
On 06/28/2016 12:54 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Chip:
I know this question is not specifically germane to Postfix but everyone
on this list has extensive experience with bouncing policies.
If a receiver of campaign emails (that promotes itself as an email
security service) sends bounces to "reply-to" rather than "bounces-to"
as a policy despite bounces-to present in all campaign emails headers,
would this be considered a violation of RFCs?
RFCs are published at ietf.org, so I did an experiment:
site:ietf.org bounces-to
Neither google.com nor bing.com produced any matches.
I guess that result speaks for itself, no?
Wietse
