My mistake NOT "bounces-to" rather "return-path" as in the following
snippet of campaign emails from Home Depot, Martha Stewart and Sears:
From - Mon Jun 20 08:43:03 2016
X-Account-Key: account15
X-UIDL: UID1962-1324328699
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
X-Mozilla-Keys:
Return-path:<bounce-21178_html-212410161-2947777-1014284...@bounce.homedepotemail.com>
From - Tue Jun 21 14:39:36 2016
X-Account-Key: account15
X-UIDL: UID1969-1324328699
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
X-Mozilla-Keys:
Return-path:<everydayf...@mail.marthastewart.com>
From - Mon Jun 20 08:43:02 2016
X-Account-Key: account15
X-UIDL: UID1961-1324328699
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
X-Mozilla-Keys:
Return-path:<sears2.5...@envfrm.rsys2.com>
So is "Return-path" supposed to be respected? Because the company I was
speaking of insists it's appropriate to send bounces to something other
than "Return-path" usually the "From" or "Reply-to".
On 06/28/2016 03:36 PM, Jim Reid wrote:
On 28 Jun 2016, at 20:26, Jeffs Chips <jeffsch...@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm just saying that ALL email campaign services allow and indeed suggest users
to identity a specific sole purpose email account in which to receive bounces
to eliminate spam and which almost all email campaigners adhere to
The IETF process is open to all. Feel free to make use of it.
BTW, the IETF is where Internet email protocols get developed and documented.
It doesn’t and can’t happen on postfix-users.
