Here's a related recent thread 
http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/postscreen-dnsbl-AND-smtpd-recipient-restrictions-rbl-tt91307.html#none



>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] 
>On Behalf Of Alex
>Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 3:58 PM
>To: postfix users list
>Subject: Postscreen and reject_rhsbl
>
>Hi,
>I'm using postfix-3.1.4 on fedora. I've just noticed I've configured
>both postscreen to use spamhaus and other RBLs as well as have
>configured the reject_rhsbl_* options. Is this duplicative and
>unnecessary?
>
>I've posted what I think are the relevant pieces in hopes someone
>could review and clarify.
>
>smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
>        reject_non_fqdn_recipient,
>        reject_non_fqdn_sender,
>        reject_unlisted_recipient,
>        reject_unknown_recipient_domain,
>        permit_mynetworks,
>        reject_unauth_destination,
>        reject_rhsbl_reverse_client mykey.dbl.dq.spamhaus.net,
>        reject_rhsbl_sender mykey.dbl.dq.spamhaus.net,
>        reject_rhsbl_helo mykey.dbl.dq.spamhaus.net,
>        check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/check_backscatterer,
>        check_helo_access pcre:/etc/postfix/helo_checks.pcre,
>        check_helo_access hash:/etc/postfix/helo_checks,
>        reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname,
>        reject_invalid_helo_hostname,
>        check_policy_service unix:private/policy-spf,
>        check_policy_service inet:127.0.0.1:2501,
>        check_recipient_access pcre:/etc/postfix/relay_recips_access,
>        permit
>
>smtpd_client_restrictions =
>        permit_mynetworks,
>        check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/client_checks,
>        check_reverse_client_hostname_access
>pcre:/etc/postfix/fqrdns-042715a.pcre,
>        check_reverse_client_hostname_access
>pcre:/etc/postfix/reverse_client_hostname_access.pcre,
>        check_client_access cidr:/etc/postfix/client_access_blocklist
>        check_client_access cidr:/etc/postfix/ransomware-ipbl
>
>
>postscreen_dnsbl_ttl = 10m
>postscreen_access_list =
>        permit_mynetworks,
>        cidr:/etc/postfix/postscreen_access.cidr,
>        cidr:/etc/postfix/gmail_whitelist.cidr,
>        cidr:/etc/postfix/postscreen_spf_whitelist.cidr
>postscreen_blacklist_action = drop
>postscreen_dnsbl_action = enforce
>postscreen_greet_action = enforce
>postscreen_greet_wait = ${stress?2}${stress:11}s
>postscreen_dnsbl_threshold = 8
>postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map =
>        texthash:$config_directory/postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map.pcre
>postscreen_dnsbl_sites =
>        mykey.zen.dq.spamhaus.net=127.0.0.[10;11]*8
>        score.senderscore.com=127.0.4.[0..19]*3
>        score.senderscore.com=127.0.4.[20..29]*3
>        score.senderscore.com=127.0.4.[30..49]*2
>        score.senderscore.com=127.0.4.[50..59]*1
>        score.senderscore.com=127.0.4.[60..69]*1
>        score.senderscore.com=127.0.4.[70..79]*-1
>        score.senderscore.com=127.0.4.[80..89]*-2
>        score.senderscore.com=127.0.4.[90..100]*-4
>        b.barracudacentral.org*7
>        mykey.zen.dq.spamhaus.net=127.0.0.[4..7]*6
>        bl.mailspike.net*4
>        bl.spamcop.net*4
>        bl.spameatingmonkey.net*4
>        mykey.zen.dq.spamhaus.net=127.0.0.3*4
>        ubl.unsubscore.com=127.0.0.2*1
>        list.dnswl.org=127.[0..255].[0..255].0*-2
>        list.dnswl.org=127.[0..255].[0..255].1*-3
>        list.dnswl.org=127.[0..255].[0..255].[2..255]*-4
>        dnsbl.sorbs.net=127.0.0.[10;14]*8
>        dnsbl.sorbs.net=127.0.0.5*7
>        dnsbl.sorbs.net=127.0.0.7*4
>        dnsbl.sorbs.net=127.0.0.6*3
>        dnsbl.sorbs.net=127.0.0.[8;9]*2
>        dnsbl.sorbs.net=127.0.0.4*1

Reply via email to