> On Nov 14, 2017, at 1:50 PM, Noel Jones <njo...@megan.vbhcs.org> wrote:
>
> Usually (almost always) REJECT is a more appropriate action for
> unwanted mail. Is there some reason you can't use REJECT until this
> is fixed?
>
> I guess you're using this to trap mail your users send to bad/typo
> domains eg. hotmal.com? In that case, REJECT would be better to
> notify the user of their mistake.
The effect is of course different for multi-recipient mail.
With DISCARD no recipients get the ail, with REJECT only
the "bad" recipients don't get the mail. If one of the
"good" recipients then uses "Reply-All" the "bad" recipient
might still see the message.
And yet I am still puzzled what the use-case is for
DISCARD in check_recipient_a_access... I hope the
OP is willing to elaborate on what real-world problem
that solves...
--
Viktor.
