> On Nov 14, 2017, at 1:50 PM, Noel Jones <njo...@megan.vbhcs.org> wrote: > > Usually (almost always) REJECT is a more appropriate action for > unwanted mail. Is there some reason you can't use REJECT until this > is fixed? > > I guess you're using this to trap mail your users send to bad/typo > domains eg. hotmal.com? In that case, REJECT would be better to > notify the user of their mistake.
The effect is of course different for multi-recipient mail. With DISCARD no recipients get the ail, with REJECT only the "bad" recipients don't get the mail. If one of the "good" recipients then uses "Reply-All" the "bad" recipient might still see the message. And yet I am still puzzled what the use-case is for DISCARD in check_recipient_a_access... I hope the OP is willing to elaborate on what real-world problem that solves... -- Viktor.