On Fri, December 29, 2017 8:18 pm, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > ssl usually means port 465 with implicit SSL, while 587 requires explicit > ssl (aka starttls).
with Outlook 2010, it has: none/tls/ssl/auto so, I've tried tls as well as ssl, just in case > However, with default postfix/master configuration, those should report > postfix/smtps/smtpd (465) or postfix/submission/smtpd (587), see master.cf > options for those services that should contain "-o syslog_name=..." > > the line below contains postfix/smtpd which indicates port 25 was used, > unless don't set syslog_name in master.cf. > >> (Outlook account setup test message) >> Dec 29 14:27:44 geko postfix/smtpd[14089]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from >> d114-75-83-107.sbr1.nsw.optusnet.com.au[114.75.83.107]: 554 5.7.1 >> <d114-75-83-107.sbr1.nsw.optusnet.com.au[114.75.83.107]>: Client host >> rejected: Access denied; from=<no...@dom.org.au> to=<no...@dom.org.au> >> proto=ESMTP helo=<UserPC> > > "Client host rejected: Access denied" indicates failed > "check_client_access" > directive. That also means that none of former directives succeeded, > including permit_sasl_authenticated. sasl is not enabled on port 25 by > default (iirc) > > 587 and 465 usually only allow and require authentication, since they > only have "permit_sasl_authenticated,reject" options. > > This also indicates that the client did not connect to port 587/465 - are > those ports open and accessible from client? it's 587 yes, definitely, I've setupup 4 or 5 TBird mail clients no issues, I have K9 mail client, no issues also, tested with Outlook 2016 and, the Outlook in question does work with 'old' 2.1 server maybe port 587 that was entered didn't stick ? so, it connects on port 25...? Starting Nmap 5.51 22/tcp open ssh 25/tcp open smtp 80/tcp open http 110/tcp open pop3 143/tcp open imap 443/tcp open https 587/tcp open submission 993/tcp open imaps 995/tcp open pop3s
