On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 at 12:04, Wietse Venema <wie...@porcupine.org> wrote:
> Dominic Raferd: > > By (limited) experiment it seems to me that the action 'PERMIT' is > > acceptable in access tables in smtpd restriction lists (e.g. > > smtpd_client_restrictions). > > > > As far as I can tell it is undocumented in this context, but I think it > is > > The 'permit' action is documented in the access(5) manpage > in the section 'OTHER ACTIONS'. > > $ man 5 access | less '+/^OTHER ACTIONS' > OTHER ACTIONS > restriction... > Apply the named UCE restriction(s) (permit, > reject, > reject_unauth_destination, and so on). > > BCC user@domain > ... > > Note the action name is case-insensitive, thus PERMIT is the same > as permit. > Thanks Wietse for pointing that out. I believe it confirms my understanding.
