Please avoid private copies of mail, thank you. >>> I wonder that two very new documents describe something that has been long >>> recommended to avoid: postgrey
>> On Jun 7, 2020, at 8:03 AM, Laura Smith <n5d9xq3ti233xiyif...@protonmail.ch> >> wrote: >> I agree. Greylisting is a primitive, last century "sledgehammer to crack a >> nut". >> >> It has no place in 2020's anti-spam. On 07.06.20 14:10, Charles Sprickman wrote: >Iâm going to have thoughts on this next week when I trial it. > >RIght now there is no other option for âpausingâ spammers until they show >up on my DNSBLs⦠> >I tried postscreen with the after-220 checks that implement a very brief >âgreylistâ, but it was largely ineffective. I don't think greylisting would be more effective than this. I found postscreen more effective (and less problemativ) than postgrey. Of course, you need to allow pre-greet checks, where especially pregreet text (postscreen_greet_action=enforce) does great job. ... and it does not introduce delays. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Remember half the people you know are below average.
