Doug Denault:
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2023, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > Doug Denault:
> >> On Mon, 20 Feb 2023, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >>
> >>> Doug Denault:
> >>>> The most current message (edited for privacy):
> >>>>
> >>>> Feb 20 09:25:14 freeport postfix/qmgr[88969]: 7883F510EBC:
> >>>> from=<i...@domain1.com>, size=1943447, nrcpt=41 (queue active)
> >>>> Feb 20 09:25:15 freeport postfix/smtp[67456]: 7883F510EBC:
> >>>> to=<some...@domain2.com>, relay=none, delay=329206,
> >>>> delays=329205/0.08/0.27/0, dsn=4.4.1, status=deferred (connect to
> >>>> mcahd.com[10.86.238.4]:25: Connection refused)
> >>>
> >>> Where is the proof that the message actually had delay_warning_time on?
> >>>
> >>> postcat -eq 7883F510EBC | grep warning_message_time
> >>> ====================================================
> >> lighthouse:/usr/l|ocal/etc/postfix> postconf -n
> > |
> > No, I asked for po|stcat output.
> |
> What option? I did t|hem all and did not see anything I thought shed any
> more light on this. |I can send any option but need to edit out the email
> body if you need one| of those options.
|
This command:---------+
postcat -eq 7883F510EBC | grep warning_message_time
If the output is empty, then you did not enable delay warnings.
You may have to specify a different queue ID than 7883F510EBC, if
that message has already been returned to the sender.
Wietse
> _____
> Douglas Denault
> http://www.safeport.com
> d...@safeport.com
> Voice: 301-217-9220
> Fax: 301-217-9277
>
