Unfortunately, due to company policy, I can only work with RPM packages from either the default repo or EPEL and nothing else. I know several other companies that have the same rule. Its not something that I can change, so I work with what I have.
On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 11:14:14 -0500 PGNet Dev via Postfix-users <postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote: > > The problem with dkimpy/dkimpy-milter, is that they don't exist in > > enterprise distros (Alma, Rocky, Oracle) via EPEL. > FWIW, it's a trivial install with python/pip, and plays nicely in a venv. > works a charm here. > > rpm spec's also straightforward. > > here's one for Fedora, > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-dkimpy/blob/rawhide/f/python-dkimpy.spec > > none's built for EPEL atm, but the infrastructure is there, > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-dkimpy > > any interested party could certainly chime in there > > should be similar for dkimpy-milter ... > _______________________________________________ > Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org > To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org _______________________________________________ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
