It's inevitable that typographic content be utilized in any digital form of "written" visual communication. At the foundation of contemporary computer technology is the digital >graphic communication< machine.
Snail mail composed on a typewriter is virtually non-existent because such communication is merely verbal and the graphic encoding potential of the page is a missed opportunity to communicate more effectively. For eMail, the ballooning data transfer over the net is due to mail attachments... and if we can attach images, why not go ahead and >show< them in the composition window (instead of just listing them). When compared to: - image and music content being transferred to browsers - internet videophon sessions - internet phone calling the small amount of HTML coding required to describe basic >typographic< formatting (like that possible in Apple's Mail software... font, size, style, color,) is virtually insignificant. If folks choose not to use such features - that is OK. Yet, for those who understand how use such graphic variation for clearer communication.... Mel