He Marlyse, Too cute to not reply. :-) That's exactly my point. Yes, I typed a return right where you supposed. And had PM NOT wrapped it at 78, but allowed me to set the wrap for, say 110 as I've done quite satisfactorily for the past 96+ months, that's how it would still have shown up.
:-) Have a great day, Marlyse. ht ////////////////\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ On 11/23/03, Marlyse Comte wrote: >hehe... can't resist this last one - but I promise, after this one I'll >let it rest too: > >the following quote is exactly how I received your last message: > >As for silly "original poster" not getting the point; I got it. I got it >years >ago, MANY years ago. > >my question: > >now, is that really how you wanted to line-break? I am pretty certain not >and that you will say, yeah, exactly my point, I hit return AFTER the >word years, not before and that darn PM doesn't allow me to send it out >like that. > >right? if you think so, you've just proven that you indeed did not get >the point some people tried getting across to you. and in return, you'll >think that we don't get the point you are trying to get across to us. > >no biggie, really. > >you think you are right and I think I am right, that is all ;-) > >---marlyse > >
