Matthias - I think you have missed my point. I also think you have overlooked at least an occasional attempt to be helpful.
As to html, I am not asking for anything new. I am asking for an existing feature to work as expected (printing). How many other Mac programs do you know of which can't print things they can display, forcing you to use another program as a workaround? In any other software most users would be up in arms about a basic feature like printing not working properly. I am merely pointing that out. I would not expect freeware to have this flaw. If that is whining, so be it. This does not mean PowerMail does not "rock" in lots of other areas. But would you expect a Mercedes 500 SL to have steel wheels or lack ABS? - Winston Matthias Schmidt wrote: >Winston, > >you are wining here around on the list since you subscribed. >Understand Powermail is a textmailer, so if you want to have html use >something else. >Powermail is not a 1200$ product, it is shareware and in this price-range. >Recently I wrote a E-Mail implementation for a database and I tested all >mail-clients available for the Mac and all I can say is, PowerMail rocks >comparing to others and it was the most stable mailclient in my tests. >So what do you want from Jérôme, to write on the list something like mea >culpa, I'm sorry I wrote such a bad software? >Come on grow up! >Matthias > >Am/On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 10:42:03 -0400 schrieb/wrote Winston Weinmann: > >>Matthias - >> >>With all due respect, I think it is more accurate to say that the flaws >>which PowerMail has (such as not being able to print HTML mail) do not >>bother /you/. That does not mean PowerMail does not have flaws, nor does >>it excuse CTM for not acknowledging or addressing those flaws if they >>affect other users. >> >>Regards, >> >>- Winston >> >> >>Matthias Schmidt wrote: >> >>>Bernd, >>> >>>Am/On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 08:07:57 +0200 schrieb/wrote Bernd Fröhlich: >>> >>>>Winston Weinmann schrieb: >>>>> While I love PowerMail, it has some bugs in it that are like beta level >>>>> software. CTM should be embarrassed, and probably is. >>>>> >>>> >>>>That pretty much confirms my suspicion. I was thinking about using >>>>PowerMail but wanted to see how it is supported first, so I subscribed >>>>to this list. >>>>From their website I already had the impression that it is not receiving >>>>much attention and this thread confirms it. >>> >>>not true period. >>>I'm using PM since years without any flaw. >>> >>>Thanks and all the best >>> >>>Matthias >>> >>> >> >> >> > >Thanks and all the best > >Matthias > >
