> Am 11.04.2023 um 14:17 schrieb paul tarvydas <paultarvy...@gmail.com>: > > "If you specifically want numpy, it may be possible to have Common Lisp > talking to python." > > CL can run python > > (uiop:run-program "python3 ~/quicklisp/local-projects/clvpy/hello.py" :output > t) > > This isn't 1950 anymore. 1950s biases about what "efficiency" means no > longer apply. > > (Lisp used to be concerned with "development time efficiency" and can be > again) > > pt In that regard, there is py4cl2: https://github.com/digikar99/py4cl2 Not sure if you know. MB
- Re: Numpy and Common Lis... Marco Antoniotti
- Re: Numpy and Common Lis... Craig
- Re: Numpy and Common Lis... Robert Goldman
- Re: Numpy and Common Lis... Antoni GrzymaĆa
- Re: Numpy and Common Lis... Marco Antoniotti
- Re: Numpy and Common Lis... Steven Nunez
- Re: Numpy and Common Lis... Stelian Ionescu
- Re: Numpy and Common Lis... Robert Goldman
- Re: Numpy and Common Lis... Stelian Ionescu
- Re: Numpy and Common Lisp? paul tarvydas
- Re: Numpy and Common Lisp? Manfred Bergmann
- Re: Numpy and Common Lis... Robert Goldman
- Re: Numpy and Common Lis... Shubhamkar Ayare
- Re: Numpy and Common Lisp? mich...@stray-hound.com
- Re: Numpy and Common Lisp? Steven Nunez
- Re: Numpy and Common Lisp? Daniel Herring
- Re: Numpy and Common Lisp? Robert Goldman
- Re: Numpy and Common Lisp? Steven Nunez
- Re: Numpy and Common Lisp? lpgl
- Re: Numpy and Common Lisp? Marco Antoniotti