Hi As the main proponent of the utility ‘irsabol’ I am partial to Julia (which is a Common Lisp in a drag :) ). IMHO Julia is doing many things right.
All the best Marco On Thu, 13 Apr 2023 at 04:18, <l...@free.fr> wrote: > Hi Robert, > > To add to the list of library propositions for numpy in Lisp, we can > probably also have a look at the language Hylang that is a Lisp dialect > that's embedded in Python. > > Cheers > > * Robert Goldman > | Hi, Daniel -- > > | I was looking for a system that I could use to do some numerical > | computations I now do in Python in CL instead. That involves a > | relatively large function library (or perhaps more accurately, the > | developers of numpy have a better idea what functions are likely to be > | needed than do I), and the ability to do vectorized operations. > > | I asked for a CFFI binding because I found a number of stabs at > something similar in CL, but none looked promising for use in the short > term. > > | I'm not sure what you mean by "a custom kernel," I'm afraid. > > | Schedule was "as soon as possible," in the sense of "if it's there I > will start using it right away." > > | I guess the trait valuation is that I would like something that I > | could use instead of numpy, so quite portable (although if it only > | worked in SBCL, that would be fine), implementation effort: > | essentially none (I want to use a capable linear algebra library, not > | write one). > > | Best, > | R > > -- Marco Antoniotti https://dcb.disco.unimib.it